It could be that Jews are surrendering any future significant use of the SPLC, that perhaps either its legal trouble, or the hit to its reputation render it less practical now. For precedent, look to the NAACP. In 1909, it was founded not by blacks, but by Jews. It was run by Jews, with a Jew president, from 1909 to 1975, after the end of the civil rights era. Once it passed into the hands of blacks in 1975, it became essentially irrelevant and impotent.
So if a bank or hedge fund funneled millions to Al Qaida or ISIS or to Mexico for cartels and executives and if management responsible for the crimes would not be charged, what good is the law then if the effect is punishment for innocent employees and shareholders?
It could be that Jews are surrendering any future significant use of the SPLC, that perhaps either its legal trouble, or the hit to its reputation render it less practical now. For precedent, look to the NAACP. In 1909, it was founded not by blacks, but by Jews. It was run by Jews, with a Jew president, from 1909 to 1975, after the end of the civil rights era. Once it passed into the hands of blacks in 1975, it became essentially irrelevant and impotent.
very interesting point, thanks
https://realnewsandhistory.com/anyt-07-24-26/
Todd Blanche Dubois
So if a bank or hedge fund funneled millions to Al Qaida or ISIS or to Mexico for cartels and executives and if management responsible for the crimes would not be charged, what good is the law then if the effect is punishment for innocent employees and shareholders?
That is definitely not what one gathers from https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/nonprofit-indicted-bank-fraud/
Charging individuals is the key weapon in the Fed's Bank Fraud torture chamber.
I fear the worst.